CALYPSO TOWERS RESORTCOMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.,CALYPSO COA HOLDINGS, LLC,THE CALYPSO GROUP, LLC, THECALYPSO DEVELOPERS I, LLC,THE CALYPSO DEVELOPERS II,LLC, THE CALYPSO DEVELOPERSIII, LLC,
Respondents.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.
November 20, 2024
PER CURIAM.
The Court denies the June 5, 2024, motion to dismiss receiveras a party-participant. Further, the Court treats Petitioner’srequest for the lower tribunal to render a final judgment as amotion for an order granting the lower tribunal leave to render afinal judgment. Fla. R. App. P. 9.040(c); Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(f).
Original opinion page 2
2Upon consideration of Petitioner’s motion, the Court grants themotion and grants the lower tribunal leave to render any finalorder(s) necessary for disposing of the underlying cause,notwithstanding the pendency of Case No. 1D2024-1151. Becausethe petition for writ of mandamus sought to compel entry of a finaljudgment, the Court denies the petition as moot.ROBERTS, RAY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur._____________________________Not final until disposition of any timely andauthorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or9.331._____________________________Stephen Syfrett of Williams & Syfrett, PLLC, Panama City, forPetitioner.Christine R. Davis of Davis Appeals, PLLC, Tallahassee; MatthewR. Cogburn of Cogburn Law Firm, P.A., Tampa; Craig B. Morris ofMorris Law Firm, P.C., Point Clear, AL.; Mark F. Robens ofStichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A., Tampa; Jodi Daniel Duboseof Stichter, Riedel, Blain & Postler, P.A., Pensacola, forRespondents.
Opinion text and original PDF from Florida First District Court of Appeal · Source opinion