On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County.Jamie L. Tyndal, Judge.
September 23, 2026
PER CURIAM.
Appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Knight did not file a pro sebrief. Following our independent review, we affirm the revocationof Knight’s supervision and his orally pronounced sentences. Thewritten judgment and sentencing documents, however, containscrivener’s errors requiring correction.
A scrivener’s error is “a mistake in the written sentence thatis at variance with the oral pronouncement of sentence or therecord but not those errors that are the result of a judicialdetermination or error.” Ashley v. State, 850 So. 2d 1265, 1268 n.3(Fla. 2003) (citation omitted); see also Williams v. State, 422 So. 3d1155, 1164 (Fla. 5th DCA 2025). The judgment incorrectly states
Original opinion page 2
2that Knight was tried and found guilty, although he admitted tothe violations of probation in an open plea. The count 2 sentencingform does not reflect the revocation of Knight’s supervision. Andthe written designations of concurrent sentences conflict with theoral pronouncement of a five-year sentence on count 1 followed bya consecutive three-year sentence on count 2.We therefore remand solely for the trial court to correct thejudgment to reflect Knight’s orally pronounced sentence. Knightneed not be present for these ministerial corrections. See Berry v.State, 342 So. 3d 283, 283 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022).AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s errors.BILBREY, TREADWELL, and NEFF, JJ., concur._____________________________Not final until disposition of any timely andauthorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or9.331._____________________________Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Joel Daniel Arnold,Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Opinion text and original PDF from Florida First District Court of Appeal · Source opinion