On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County.James Lee Marsh, Judge.
November 5, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Dexter Lawson appeals his convictions of attempted murder,theft, and tampering with evidence. We reject his claims that thetrial court erred in failing to permit him to reopen his case andthat fundamental error occurred in the State’s closing argument.Lawson also claims that his sentence as a prison releaseereoffender was unconstitutional because the determination ofwhether he was released from prison within three years ofcommitting his current offense was not made by the jury. Even ifwe presume that the court erred by failing to require a jurydetermination, we find that such error was harmless beyond areasonable doubt. Hicks v. State, 50 Fla. L. Weekly D2238a (Fla.1st DCA Oct. 15, 2025); Dowdell v. State, 50 Fla. L. Weekly D2236c
Original opinion page 2
2(Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 15, 2025); McGlaun v. State, 50 Fla. L. WeeklyD2178a (Fla. 1st DCA Oct. 1, 2025).AFFIRMED.RAY and KELSEY, JJ., concur. WINOKUR, J., concurs with opinion._____________________________Not final until disposition of any timely andauthorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or9.331._____________________________WINOKUR, J., concurring.Lawson made his constitutional claim by motion underFlorida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). Consistent with myopinion in Hicks v. State, 50 Fla. L. Weekly D2238a (Fla. 1st DCAOct. 15, 2025), I conclude that this issue raises an error in thesentencing process and, therefore, may not be raised by motionunder rule 3.800(b). Nonetheless, I agree that we should affirmbecause the error was harmless._____________________________Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, AssistantPublic Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Amanda A. Uwaibi,Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Opinion text and original PDF from Florida First District Court of Appeal · Source opinion