On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County.Kelvin C. Wells, Judge.
February 19, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Appellant was found guilty on eleven separate charges. Heraises three issues on appeal, two of which we affirm withoutfurther comment. Appellant argues that the trial courtfundamentally erred because two of his convictions violate hisright against double jeopardy. We agree.
Under Count II, Appellant was charged and found guilty ofburglary of a dwelling while armed with a firearm. Under CountIII, he was charged with burglary of a dwelling with assault orbattery. Appellant argues these convictions violate doublejeopardy because the charges are based on a single uninvitedentry. The State properly concedes error.
Original opinion page 2
2In Williams v. State, 927 So. 2d 145, 146 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006),this Court held that double jeopardy precluded the defendant’sdual convictions and sentences where both burglary charges arosefrom a single entry of the dwelling and involved only one victim.See also Burkhalter v. State¸111 So. 3d 993 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013);McKinney v. State, 860 So. 2d 452, 452 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)(“Because there was only one entry, the dual convictions andsentences on the two burglary charges cannot stand.”).Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the trial court withinstructions to vacate one of the burglary convictions and itscorresponding sentence. Appellant’s judgment and sentence isaffirmed in all other regards.AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.KELSEY, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur._____________________________Not final until disposition of any timely andauthorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or9.331._____________________________Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Pamela D. Presnell,Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Daren L. Shippy,Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Opinion text and original PDF from Florida First District Court of Appeal · Source opinion