On appeal from the County Court for Escambia.Barry E. Dickson Jr., Judge.
January 2, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Mandie Zimmerman challenges the trial court’s entry ofsummary final judgment against her for defaulting on repaymentof an educational loan. Zimmerman’s main argument on appeal isthat reversal is required because Financial Portfolios II Inc.(“FPII”) failed to produce sufficient evidence establishing itsownership of the note or how it obtained the note from the originallender. We agree and reverse.
The loan documents in the record (attached to the complaintand produced as exhibits in support of summary judgment) reflectthat FPII was not the original holder of the note. Although thereare some assignment documents in the record, none of themestablish if or when the note was assigned by the original holder.
Original opinion page 2
2Because there is insufficient evidence in the record to establishFPII’s right to enforce the note—such as the complete chain oftitle—we reverse the trial court’s entry of summary judgment.Lovette v. Nat’l Collegiate Student Loan Tr. 2004-1, 149 So. 3d 735,737 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) (“Because there [was] no evidence in therecord at the time of the hearing regarding how [the purportednote holder] acquired the note, summary final judgment wasimproper.”); Hunter v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC, 137 So. 3d 570,573 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (explaining that a foreclosure plaintiffmust show it held or owned the note at the time the complaint wasfiled).REVERSED and REMANDED.OSTERHAUS, C.J., and BILBREY and NORDBY, JJ., concur._____________________________Not final until disposition of any timely andauthorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or9.331._____________________________Justin S. Hemlepp of Law Office of Justin Hemlepp, Ashland,Kentucky, for Appellant.Robert J. Lindeman and Ralph Marcadis of Marcadis Singer P.A.,Tampa, for Appellee.
Opinion text and original PDF from Florida First District Court of Appeal · Source opinion