DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDASECOND DISTRICT
BENJAMIN HILLARD,
Appellant,
v.
CITY OF LARGO,
Appellee.
No. 2D2024-2067
October 17, 2025
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Thomas M.Ramsberger, Judge.
Benjamin E. Hillard and Amy Cuykendall Jones of Hillard Cuykendall,P.A., Largo, for Appellant.
Matthew D. Weidner of Weidner Law, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Benjamin Hillard appeals an order granting the City of Largo'smotion for sanctions and the resulting final judgment imposingsanctions. Mr. Hillard represented Robert Halgren in a foreclosure actioninitiated by the City. A final judgment of foreclosure was entered againstMr. Halgren, and it was affirmed per curiam by this court. Halgren v.City of Largo, 387 So. 3d 282 (Fla. 2d DCA 2024). After the appeal, thetrial court granted the City's motion for sanctions based on section
Original opinion page 2
257.105(1), Florida Statutes (2021), and directed that the City was entitledto an award of attorney's fees and costs to be assessed equally againstMr. Hillard and Mr. Halgren.1 In its order, the trial court found asfollows:The totality of the trial court record reveals that even afterthat formal notice, counsel Hillard persisted with a course ofdilatory and bad faith conduct completely unabatedthroughout the course of these proceedings. The record isreplete with last minute, dilatory filings, and bad faithpleadings and assertions. Counsel has done nothingwhatsoever to recede from any of these practices or towithdraw or abandon any of the bad faith claims or positions.Thereafter, the trial court entered a final judgment requiring Mr.Halgren and Mr. Hillard to pay sanctions in the total amount of$28,529.00. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that thetrial court did not err in awarding sanctions against attorney Hillard.Affirmed.NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.1 This court dismissed the appeal as to Mr. Halgren.
Opinion text and original PDF from Florida Second District Court of Appeal · Source opinion