DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDASECOND DISTRICT
ROBIN ANNETTE McGRATH ROWE,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 2D2024-2022
December 12, 2025
Appeal from the County Court for Manatee County; Melissa Gould,Judge.
Blair Allen, Public Defender, and Caroline Joan S. Picart, AssistantPublic Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
SILBERMAN, Judge.
In this appeal brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.738 (1967), Robin Annette McGrath Rowe appeals her judgment andsentence for driving under the influence with property damage and/orpersonal injury. With the exception of one cost that was improperlyimposed, we affirm Ms. McGrath Rowe's judgment and sentence.
While this appeal was pending, Ms. McGrath Rowe filed a motion tocorrect sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
Original opinion page 2
23.800(b)(2). The motion asserted that the trial court imposed a lumpsum of $376 in costs without citation to statutory authority. The trialcourt granted the motion to correct sentencing error and struck theinvestigative costs to the Bradenton Police Department and the impoundfee. In its order, the court further directed the clerk to amend the costsorder, and it provided the statutory authority for the costs that wereimposed.However, the amended cost worksheet improperly imposed a $223lump sum cost without citation to any authority.1 "The statutoryauthority for all costs imposed, whether they are mandatory ordiscretionary, must be cited in the written order." Weber v. State, 368So. 3d 487, 489 (Fla. 2d DCA 2023) (quoting Vick v. State, 37 So. 3d 951,952 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)). We therefore reverse the $223 imposed costand direct that the trial court may reimpose court costs on remand if itprovides the statutory authority for their assessment. Seeid.Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for entry of acorrected fee order.SLEET and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.1 The "Cost Worksheet" used by the Manatee County Clerk shouldnot solely be used to support the imposition of costs because, although itcontains a checklist for various costs, it fails to include the statutoryauthority for the costs.
Opinion text and original PDF from Florida Second District Court of Appeal · Source opinion