Opinion filed July 30, 2026.Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D25-0065
Lower Tribunal No. 24-2540-CA-01
Cecilia S. Pino, et al.,Appellants,
vs.
Hudson Excess Insurance Company, et al.,Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Vivianne delRio, Judge.
Ver Ploeg & Marino, P.A., and Robert P. Major and Benjamin C.Hassebrock and Derrick S. Natal (Orlando), for appellants.
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP and Sarah Hafeez and Carol M. Rooney(Ft. Lauderdale); Insurance Advisors and Consultants LLC and Ronald L.Kammer; De Novo and Kathryn L. Ender, for appellees.
Before SCALES C.J., and LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Original opinion page 2
2Affirmed. See Glenn v. Roberts, 95 So. 3d 271, 272 (Fla. 3d DCA2012) (“A motion for judgment on the pleadings may be granted only if themoving party is clearly entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”);Fontainebleau Florida Hotel LLC v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 408So. 3d 862, 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025) (“[I]n construing insurance policies,courts should read each policy as a whole, endeavoring to give everyprovision its full meaning…. Where the policy language is plain andunambiguous, no special rule of construction or interpretation applies, andthe court should give the plain language in the contract the meaning it clearlyexpresses.”); Aiello v. ASI Preferred Corp., 315 So. 3d 713, 719 (Fla. 4thDCA 2021) (“[T]he Watercraft Exclusion and severability clause at issue inthis case use the term ‘an insured’ rather than ‘the insured.’ Courts haverepeatedly recognized that ‘an insured’ and ‘the insured’ are distinct andhave separate meanings; ‘an’ means ‘any’ and ‘the’ means a specificinsured.” (emphasis in original)); Acceleration Nat. Serv. Corp. v. Brickell Fin.Servs. Motor Club, Inc., 541 So. 2d 738, 739 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (holdingthat in a contract “‘any’ is often synonymous with ‘either,’ ‘every,’ or ‘all’” and“‘any’ is defined as ‘[o]ne or another without restriction or exception’” (internalcitations omitted)).
Opinion text and original PDF from Florida Third District Court of Appeal · Source opinion