Opinion filed April 29, 2026.Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D25-1947
Lower Tribunal No. 24-1937-CP-02
Emilie Gonzalez, et al.,Appellants,
vs.
Maria Del Pilar Alvarez,Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose LuisFernandez, Judge.
Valero Law PLLC, and David T. Valero and Amanda E. Valero-Vincent(Davie), for appellants.
Law Offices of Mendez & Mendez, P.A., and Sergio L. Mendez, DanielJ. Mendez, and Daniela C. Pachon, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Original opinion page 2
2Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, theappellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so asto conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence orby an alternative theory.”); Mercer v. Raine, 443 So. 2d 944, 945 (Fla. 1983)(“The exercise of discretion by a trial judge who sees the parties first-handand is more fully informed of the situation, is essential to the just and properapplication of procedural rules. In the absence of facts showing an abuse ofthat discretion, the trial court’s decision excusing, or refusing to excuse,noncompliance with rules . . . must be affirmed. . . . It is the duty of the trialcourt, and not the appellate courts, to make that determination.” (quotationomitted)).
Opinion text and original PDF from Florida Third District Court of Appeal · Source opinion