Opinion filed March 25, 2026.Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D25-1597
Lower Tribunal No. 25-80537-CC-05
Jennifer Marckx,Appellant,
vs.
Cumis LLC,Appellee.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, EleaneSosa-Bruzón, Judge.
Jennifer Marckx, in proper person.
Floridian Legal and Henry M. Gamboa, for appellee.
Before SCALES, C.J., and LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Jennfer Marckx (“Tenant”) appeals the trial court’s final judgment of
Original opinion page 2
2possession in favor of Cumis LLC (“Landlord”). We summarily affirm the trialcourt’s final judgment because the Tenant has not provided a transcript ofthe non-jury trial proceedings and, thus, has failed to bring a proper recordfor this court's review. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). As the Tenant hasfailed to meet her responsibility to ensure that a record adequate to permitresolution of the issues raised on appeal be prepared and transmitted to theappellate court, the Tenant fails to meet her burden of establishing reversibleerrors to overcome the presumption of correctness afforded to the trialcourt’s decision. See Benenson v. Marchenko, 421 So. 3d 801, 802 (Fla. 3dDCA 2025) (finding it is responsibility of appellant to bring before appellatecourt record that is adequate to support her appeal) (citing Applegate v.Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979))); Gaspardv. Innocent, 389 So. 3d 638, 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (holding that affirmanceis required where there is no transcript or proper substitute and nofundamental error on face of order appealed)).Affirmed.
Opinion text and original PDF from Florida Third District Court of Appeal · Source opinion