Opinion filed October 1, 2026.Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 3D25-1004
Lower Tribunal No. F24-18684
Lucas Gabriel Mercado,Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida,Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ellen SueVenzer, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Maria Lauredo, ChiefAssistant Public Defender, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Ryan Patrick Schelwat,Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GORDO, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Original opinion page 2
2Affirmed. SeeState v. Teamer, 151 So. 3d 421, 430 (Fla. 2014)(“Under the exclusionary rule announced by the United States SupremeCourt, the Fourth Amendment bars the use of evidence secured through anillegal search and seizure. Whether the exclusionary sanction isappropriately imposed in a particular case . . . is an issue separate from thequestion whether the Fourth Amendment rights of the party seeking to invokethe rule were violated by police conduct.” (citation modified)); State v.Walton, 565 So. 2d 381, 384 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) (“The deputy was clearlygoing to search the duffle bag. Once he discovered contraband in the dufflebag, the deputy would then have had probable cause to search the bluesuitcase. . . . The unchallenged facts establish sufficient ‘inevitability.’ It waspurely fortuitous which piece of luggage the deputy searched first. He clearlywas going to search them both.”).
Opinion text and original PDF from Florida Third District Court of Appeal · Source opinion