Skip to content

Cartel Demarcus Granison v. State of Florida

Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Decided
January 31, 2025
Docket No.
2024-1690

Judges: EDWARDS; SOUD; MACIVER

Disposition: affirmed; reversed; remanded; partial

Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 5D2024-1690 LT Case No. 2020-CF-360-A

CARTEL DEMARCUS GRANISON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. Timothy McCourt, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Judson Searcy, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

John M. Guard, Acting Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Alexander Pallas, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

January 31, 2025

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders1 appeal, after careful review of the record, we affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences on all counts and in

Original opinion page 2
Original opinion page 2
2 all respects, except as to the $50.00 cost of prosecution for the misdemeanor count imposed in the written judgment. The trial court imposed the minimum per case cost of prosecution in the amount of $50.00 for the misdemeanor count and $100.00 for the felony counts. See § 938.27(8), Fla. Stat. (2024). Section 938.27(8) states that the minimum cost is set per case based on whether a misdemeanor or a felony has been charged. Notably, the minimum costs are “per case,” not per charge. The State did not request the cost of prosecution, and the trial court did not pronounce this cost. Accordingly, Appellant’s judgment and sentence are affirmed, and the assessment of $100.00 as the cost of prosecution because there was a felony charge in the case is affirmed. The additional assessment of $50.00 as the cost of prosecution for the misdemeanor count is reversed, and the matter is remanded for entry of an amended judgment. AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED, in part; and REMANDED for entry of an amended judgment. EDWARDS, C.J., and SOUD and MACIVER, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Footnotes

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).Back to text

Opinion text and original PDF from Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal · Source opinion

Ask Ella about this case

General legal information, not legal advice. Jurisio is not a law firm.