On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County.Kathryn D. Weston, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Natalie R. Gossett,Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A.Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, forAppellee.
March 7, 2025
SOUD, J.
Appellant Erester Markque Ashford was convicted ofattempted carjacking, burglary of a conveyance, and assault (alesser-included offense of the attempted carjacking charged incount III of the information). The trial court designated him a
Original opinion page 2
2prison releasee reoffender pursuant to section 775.082(9), FloridaStatutes (2021), and sentenced him to fifteen years in the Floridastate prison system. Ashford appeals his judgment and sentencearguing, inter alia, that based on the recent United StatesSupreme Court decision in Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821(2024), his sentence is unconstitutional because a jury—not thetrial judge—was required to decide whether Ashford met thestatutory requirements of a prison releasee reoffender.We affirm in all respects and reject Ashford’s argumentsbased on Erlinger. While we do not reach the merits of hisarguments as to Erlinger’s impact, if any, upon existing FloridaStatutes and caselaw,* even if, arguendo, any error occurred here,such an error would be harmless. See Capra v. State, 50 Fla. L.Weekly D332 (Fla. 5th DCA Feb. 7, 2025) (quoting Britten v. State,181 So. 3d 1215, 1218 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)).AFFIRMED.It is so ordered.MACIVER and PRATT, JJ., concur._____________________________Not final until disposition of any timely andauthorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or9.331._____________________________* The Florida Supreme Court has accepted jurisdiction inMaye v. State, SC2023–1184, which presents substantially similarissue(s) resulting from Erlinger.
Opinion text and original PDF from Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal · Source opinion