Skip to content

Gary Zaidman v. State of Florida

Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Decided
November 8, 2024
Docket No.
2024-0467

Judges: MAKAR; LAMBERT; KILBANE

Disposition: affirmed; remanded

Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Case No. 5D2024-0467 LT Case No. 2024-00099-CFMA

GARY ZAIDMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for St. Johns County. R. Lee Smith, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Brian Hyer, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

November 8, 2024

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal,* we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence. The written judgment, however, incorrectly reflects that Appellant entered a plea to trespass on property other than a

Original opinion page 2
Original opinion page 2
2 structure or conveyance in violation of section 810.09, Florida Statutes, but he entered a plea to trespass of a conveyance in violation of section 810.08, Florida Statutes. Accordingly, we remand this case for the trial court to correct the scrivener’s error in the written judgment. See Davis v. State, 211 So. 3d 354, 354 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017) (“We remand only for correction of a scrivener’s error in judgment” in an Anders case.). AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error. MAKAR, LAMBERT, and KILBANE, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Footnotes

* Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).Back to text

Opinion text and original PDF from Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal · Source opinion

Ask Ella about this case

General legal information, not legal advice. Jurisio is not a law firm.