On appeal from the County Court for Sumter County.Paul L. Militello, Judge.
Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Evan Altes, AssistantPublic Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Zachery L.Wiseman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, forAppellee.
August 14, 2026
PER CURIAM.
Appellant’s probation was revoked based upon her admittingto several charged violations. The trial court accepted heradmission, revoked her probation, imposed a legal sentence, andordered her to pay certain outstanding fines and court costs. There
Original opinion page 2
2was no error in any aspect of that; therefore, we affirm. 1However, the written order revoking probation failed to identifythe conditions of probation that she admitted to violating andfailed to identify the conditions of probation that Appellant wasfound to have violated. Accordingly, we remand to the lowertribunal for entry of an amended written order of revocation whichsets forth the conditions of probation that Appellant violated. SeeHurta v. State, 403 So. 3d 1092 (Fla. 5th DCA 2025) (citing Bridev. State, 391 So. 3d 515 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024)).AFFIRMED; REMANDED.MAKAR, EDWARDS, and HARRIS, JJ., concur._____________________________Not final until disposition of any timely andauthorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or9.331._____________________________1 This is an Anders appeal. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S.738 (1967). Our review is in accordance with State v. Causey, 503So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1987).
Opinion text and original PDF from Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal · Source opinion