Case No. 6D2023-1929Lower Tribunal No. 2000-CF-001452-AXXX-XX
DWAYNE JOHNSON,
Appellant,v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
Appeal pursuant to Fla. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Collier County.
Elizabeth V. Krier, Judge.
November 27, 2024
PER CURIAM.
Dwayne Johnson appeals an order denying his motion for continuance,accepting the notice of voluntary withdrawal of his motion for postconviction reliefunder Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and dismissing his motion forpostconviction relief with prejudice. We have jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P.9.030(b)(1)(A), 9.140(b)(1)(D).
Under Clark v. State, 491 So. 2d 545, 546 (Fla. 1986), Johnson was entitledto withdraw his rule 3.850 motion while it was pending when there would be noprejudice to the State. SeeSimon v. State, 768 So. 2d 1089, 1090 (Fla. 3d DCA
Original opinion page 2
21995). The sole issue before us is whether the postconviction court properlydismissed Johnson’s rule 3.850 petition with prejudice. “A typical postconvictionmotion should not be dismissed with prejudice when the defendant volunteers todismiss it unless there is prejudice to the State or some justification for resolving themotion on the merits.” McCray v. State, 104 So. 3d 1201, 1201 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012);see also Hutchinson v. State, 921 So. 2d 780, 781 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).The State concedes that it will not suffer prejudice if the petition is dismissedwithout prejudice and, therefore, concedes error. The motion for postconvictionrelief should have been dismissed without prejudice, and we remand for entry ofsuch an order.REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.STARGEL, NARDELLA and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.Michelle R. Walsh, of Law Offices of Michelle R. Walsh, P.A., Coral Gables, forAppellant.Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Taylor A. Schell and CereseCrawford Taylor, Assistants Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARINGAND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
Opinion text and original PDF from Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal · Source opinion