Supreme Court of Florida No. SC00-833
PIRELLI ARMSTRONG TIRE CORPORATION,
Petitioner, vs.
META E. JENSEN,
Respondent.
[February 8, 2001]
PER CURIAM
We have for review a decision of the Second District Court of Appeal certifying the following question to be of great public importance:
WHETHER THE APPLICATION OF A
CONTINGENCY RISK MULTIPLIER TO AN
AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES UNDER SECTION
768.79, FLORIDA STATUTES (1993), THE OFFER
OF JUDGMENT STATUTE, VIOLATE[S] THE
GUARANTEE OF EQUAL PROTECTION
AFFORDED UNDER THE UNITED STATES OR
FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. v. Jensen, 752 So. 2d 1275, 1276 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
Under article V, section 3(b)(4), of the Florida Constitution, this Court has jurisdiction to review "any decision of a district court of appeal that passes upon a question certified by it to be of great public importance." Because in rendering its decision, the Second District did not pass upon the question certified to this Court, we are without jurisdiction to review this case. See Gee v. Seidman & Seidman, 653 So. 2d 384, 385 (Fla. 1995). Accordingly, we dismiss review of this case as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.
WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal - Certified Great Public Importance Second District - Case No. 2D97-04837 (Hillsborough County)
Wendy F. Lumish and Joseph H. Lang, Jr. of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, P.A., Miami, Florida, for Petitioner Hugh N. Smith and Diana L. Fuller of Smith & Fuller, P.A., Tampa, Florida, for Respondents Sharon Lee Stedman, Orlando, Florida, for the Florida Defense Lawyer’s Association, Amicus Curiae